legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Perez CA4/1
During an investigation of a referral from Child Protective Services in December of 2017, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, granddaughters of Perez who were respectively 12 and 13 years old at the time, told a social worker that Perez had touched them “inappropriately.” The social worker contacted police and referred the girls for forensic interviews.
B. Forensic Interviews
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 were interviewed by a child forensic interviewer. The interviews were recorded by video and audio.
Jane Doe 1 told the forensic interviewer that Perez had touched her “a lot” and described several incidents. The first incident that Jane Doe 1 recalled occurred when she was 11 or 12 years old and Perez drove her in his semi-truck to a truck stop; while they were inside the truck, he pulled down her pants, touched her vagina, kissed and licked it, and inserted his finger into it. Jane Doe 1 also told the interviewer that Perez had inserted his penis into her vagina “[a] bunch of times.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale