City of Fresno v. Pinedale County Water Dist. CA5
It is hereby ordered that the nonpublished opinion filed herein on June 10, 2022, be modified as follows:
1. At the end of the first sentence in the first full paragraph on page 31, after the sentence ending “in Civil Code section 1691,” add as footnote 10 the following footnote:
10 While the District also asserts the trial court erred in sustaining the City’s demurrer and denying the District’s motion to consolidate the Fresno lawsuit with the Kings County action, it does not present any meaningful legal analysis to support its claims of error or raise these issues under separate headings or subheadings, and therefore has forfeited those claims. (Kinsella v. Kinsella (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 442, 464 [an appellant who fails to present argument or legal authority “forfeits appellate consideration of the issue”]
Comments on City of Fresno v. Pinedale County Water Dist. CA5