legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.T. CA2/4
Because the sole issue on appeal relates to compliance with ICWA, we limit our summary of the facts to those relevant to that issue except as necessary for context.
Father had sole physical custody of M.T. pursuant to a custody order issued in 2019, at the termination of a previous dependency case involving the family. The custody order permitted M.T.’s mother, Martha A. (mother), to have only monitored visitation with M.T. The family came to the attention of DCFS in April 2021, when a reporting party alleged that father allowed M.T. to have unsupervised and overnight visits with mother, who had a history of substance use and was residing in a homeless encampment.
During its ensuing investigation of the allegations, DCFS spoke with paternal grandmother, paternal aunt, paternal uncle, and father’s adult daughter, some on multiple occasions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale