legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Bruhn CA3
The People charged defendant with stalking in violation of a restraining order and alleged that defendant had sustained a prior felony stalking conviction in June 2018. At the jury trial, defendant stipulated to a prior stalking conviction in October 2017, and the alleged June 2018 prior felony stalking conviction, and that both involved the same victim. He also stipulated that a restraining order prohibiting him from contacting the same victim was in effect at the time of the current offense. According to the testimony of a probation officer at trial, defendant had served a prior prison term and was on postrelease community supervision when he was arrested for the current offense. The jury found defendant guilty of stalking in violation of the restraining order and found the prior felony stalking conviction allegation to be true.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale