Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA1/2
The background and details of this dispute are summarized in our prior opinion, in which we reversed a judgment entered in Chase’s favor after the trial court erroneously granted Chase a nonsuit at trial based on the statute of frauds doctrine. (See Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Aug. 28, 2018, A147310 [nonpub. opn.].) That ruling, and those issues, are not pertinent here.
On remand, the case proceeded to a re-trial which took place over the course of about 10 days. At least eight witnesses testified, and the reporter’s transcript is more than 2,200 pages. Shiheiber has not summarized any of the trial evidence. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.204(a)(2)(C) [appellant’s brief must “[p]rovide a summary of the significant facts limited to matters in the record”].)
Comments on Shiheiber v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA1/2