legal news


Register | Forgot Password

American Express Bank v. Ezor CA2/4
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John Kralik, Judge. Affirmed.
Arthur Edward Ezor, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
Jaffe & Asher and Ray Mahdavi, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
_____________________________________________

INTRODUCTION
Respondents American Express Bank, FSB and American Express Centurion Bank sued appellant Arthur Edward Ezor to collect on his delinquent credit card balances, and appellant filed a cross-complaint, asserting two claims of unfair debt collection practices. The trial court subsequently granted respondents’ motion for summary judgment on their claims and sustained their demurrer to the cross-complaint, granting leave to amend as to one of appellant’s claims. After appellant filed an amended cross-complaint, the court sustained respondents’ second demurrer without leave to amend. Appellant moved for reconsideration, but the trial court entered judgment while his motion was pending. The court later denied app

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale