Concerned Citizens etc. v. City of Los Angeles CA2
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Richard L. Fruin, Jr. Judge. Affirmed.
Jamie T. Hall, Julian K. Quattlebaum III, and Channel Law Group, LLP, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Michael N. Feuer, City Attorney, Terry Kaufmann Macias, Assistant City Attorney, Amy Brothers and John Fox, Deputy City Attorneys, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
_________________
In this CEQA action Concerned Citizens of Beverly Hills/Beverly Grove (Concerned Citizens or appellant) appeals the trial court’s denial of its petition for writ of mandate challenging the City of Los Angeles’s approval of an ordinance allowing limited, short-term rental activity to take place within the City of Los Angeles. Although the City issued a negative declaration indicating the ordinance would not have a significant effect on the environment, appellant contends the City utilized an improper baseline and disregarded fair arguments that the ordinance would have a significant negative environmental imp
Comments on Concerned Citizens etc. v. City of Los Angeles CA2