legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jade P. CA2/7
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robin R. Kesler, Juvenile Court Referee. Conditionally affirmed and remanded with directions.
Robert McLauglin, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Mark P.
Jesse McGowan, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant Jamie M.
Tarkian & Associates and Arezoo Pichvai for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Jamie M. (Mother) and Mark P., Jr., (Father) appeal from the juvenile court’s order terminating their parental rights over 10-year-old Jade P., five-year-old Mark P. III (Mark), three-year-old James P., and two-year-old Ezekiel P. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. The parents contend as to Ezekiel the juvenile court abused its discretion in finding the beneficial parental relationship exception to termination of parental rights did not apply. The parents do not challenge the findings as to the other children. The juvenile court did not abuse its discretio

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale