CV Amalgamated v. City of Chula Vista CA4/1
THE COURT:
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on July 19, 2022, be modified as follows:
1. On page 11, delete the first two sentences of the first paragraph (starting with “Counsel for the City” and ending with “or were disqualified”), replace with the following two sentences, and add new footnote 11 as indicated, which will require the renumbering of all subsequent footnotes:
The appellate record does not contain evidence about the current status of the City’s licensing of storefront cannabis businesses.11 However, documents in the appellate record show that subsequent to the City’s denial of CVA’s applications, all of the applicants for storefront retail licenses in Council District One that had been selected to participate in Phase Two either dropped out or were disqualified.
Comments on CV Amalgamated v. City of Chula Vista CA4/1