legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Alarconnunez CA2/6
Alfonso Alarconnunez appeals from the judgment after a jury convicted him of multiple counts of sexual assault, forcible rape, burglary, and other theft crimes. (Pen. Code, §§ 261, subd. (a)(2), (3), 667.61, 220, subds. (a), (b), 288A, subd. (i), 459, 487, subd. (a).) Appellant contends recent legislative changes require reversal and remand for resentencing. The Attorney General agrees. We remand for resentencing consistent with Senate Bill No. 567 and Assembly Bill No. 518. In all other respects, we affirm the judgment.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Because the parties correctly concede this matter must be remanded for resentencing, we provide only an abbreviated summary of the factual basis for appellant’s convictions. The evidence at trial established that appellant, posing as an Uber driver gave rides to intoxicated young women. Upon entry into their apartments, he sexually assaulted each victim, took photographs and videos of them, stole valuable items from them and then sent

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale