Steven P. v. Superior Court CA5
ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for extraordinary writ review. John P. Bianco, Judge.
Steven P., in pro. per., for Petitioner.
No appearance for Respondent.
No appearance for Real Party in Interest.
-ooOoo-
Steven P. (father), in propria persona, seeks an extraordinary writ (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452) from the juvenile court’s orders issued at a 12-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (f)) on May 11, 2022, terminating reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing for August 31, 2022, as to his now seven year-old son, S.P., and five-year-old son, D.P. In his writ petition signed on May 23, 2022, father advised that he was incarcerated in Wisconsin and expected to be released on July 5, 2022, at which time he would like custody of his children. We conclude father’s writ petition fails to comply with the content requirements of rule 8.452 and dismiss it as facially inadequate for review.
Comments on Steven P. v. Superior Court CA5