legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Sanceri v. Anderson CA2/3
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Olivia Rosales, Judge. Affirmed.
Velasco Law Group and Richard J. Radcliffe for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Klinkert, Gutierrez & Neavel and James E. Klinkert for Defendant and Respondent.
_________________________
Plaintiff Katherine Sanceri sued her sister, Barbara Anderson, alleging Anderson owed her part of the proceeds from the sale of property that once belonged to their father. The trial court granted summary judgment after finding Sanceri did not have an interest in the property at the time of the sale. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Sanceri’s and Anderson’s father owned a house in Norwalk (the Property), which he quitclaimed to Anderson in January 2013. After their father’s death, Anderson allowed Sanceri to live in the house without paying rent. She told Sanceri their father said the house was “for you girls.”

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale