legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.C. CA3
D.C. is the half-brother of the minor’s mother. He is married to K.C. The juvenile court denied the requests of K.C. and D.C. for appointed counsel and de facto parent status (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 395), and they appeal. D.C. joins in, and adopts, the appellate contentions asserted by K.C. Finding no error, we will affirm the juvenile court’s orders.
BACKGROUND
K.C. filed three previous and related appeals: one from an order issued by the juvenile court in Siskiyou County (In re A.C. (Mar. 22, 2022, C093887) [nonpub. opn.], review denied June 15, 2022) and two from orders issued by the juvenile court in Butte County (In re A.C. (Mar. 24, 2022, C094217) [nonpub. opn.] & In re A.C. (C094859), dismissed Mar. 28, 2022). We take judicial notice of the record in each of K.C.’s related appeals, as well as this court’s prior orders and opinions in these cases. (Evid. Code, § 452, subd. (d).)

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale