legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Miller v. Bernie CA5
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Kings County. Kathy Ciuffini, Judge.
Charles A. Miller, in pro. per., for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Scampini, Mortara & Harris, Haig A. Harris, Jr., and Neil S. Turner for Defendant and Respondent.
-ooOoo- 
Charles Anderson Miller appeals after he was designated as a vexatious litigant who was unlikely to prevail on the merits of his lawsuit and had his case dismissed when he could not post the required security ordered by the trial court. (Code Civ. Proc., § 391.3.) In addition, Miller appeals following the trial court’s decision to issue a prefiling order against him. (§ 391.7.) For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The litigation underlying this case has been proceeding for more than a decade and has undergone multiple appeals. We recount facts relevant to the issues before us in this appeal.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale