In re G.S. CA1/1
S.S. (mother) appeals from an order terminating her parental rights under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother contends the juvenile court erred in concluding the beneficial-parental relationship exception to termination did not apply because it did not consider the exception in conformance with the principles articulated in In re Caden C. (2021) 11 Cal.5th 614 (Caden C.).
We conclude the juvenile court did not err and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Proceedings Before Section 366.26 Hearing
The juvenile court took jurisdiction of then-one-year-old G.S. (minor) and removed her from mother’s care, after mother admitted, and the court sustained, allegations that minor was at a substantial risk of harm and neglect in that “there have been multiple instances of domestic violence . . . between the mother . . . and [father], in the presence of the children” and that “mother has allowed [father] to continue to reside in the home, despite [an] active restraining order, placing the chi
Comments on In re G.S. CA1/1