In re V.M. CA4/1
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Michael Imhoff, Commissioner. Affirmed.
Pamela Rae Tripp, under appointment by the Court of Appeal for Defendant and Appellant.
Claudia Silva, Acting County Counsel, Caitlin E. Rae, Chief Deputy County Counsel and Lisa Maldonado, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
K.F. (Mother) appeals an order terminating her parental rights to her three-year-old son, V.M., and selecting a permanent plan of adoption for him pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Mother contends that the juvenile court erred by finding neither the beneficial parent-child relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i)) nor the sibling relationship exception (§ 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(v)) applied to preclude termination of her parental rights. As explained below, we affirm the order.
Comments on In re V.M. CA4/1