legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Lane v. Dept. of Corrections
Court review a judgment of dismissal after demurrer, regarding the " Writ of Mandamus . . . and Motion for Summary Judgment" filed in 2005 in superior court by plaintiff and appellant Michael Anthony Lane (a California prison inmate). In his pleading (the complaint), Lane seeks relief against respondents California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (the Department) and Jeanne S. Woodford (together defendants) for their alleged mishandling of his claims regarding the sum of $797.60, representing reimbursement of amounts taken from his inmate trust account at another prison, to satisfy then-existing restitution orders, between 1995 and 2002. Previously, in 2004, Lane obtained a small claims court judgment in that amount, which was honored by defendants. (Lane v. Dept. of Corrections (Super. Ct. San Diego County, 2004, No. SC157217).)
Court agree with the trial court that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claim for relief and it is barred by section 116.710, subdivision (a). The demurrer was properly sustained without leave to amend.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale