legal news


Register | Forgot Password

State Farm Genera. Ins. v. J.R.
Appellants are children who were sexually molested by the minor son of Becky F., their family daycare home provider. In this action State Farm General Insurance Company (State Farm) obtained a declaration of no coverage for appellants' claim under a homeowners' insurance policy it issued to Becky F. The trial court's no coverage declaration is premised on two grounds: (1) an insurance policy exclusion for claims brought by persons in child care provided by the insured and (2) the prohibition of Insurance Code section 676.1, subdivision (c) for coverage for "for losses arising out of, or in connection with, the operation of a family day care home."
Appellant appeal contending the trial court erred in granting the declaratory relief in light of the doctrine of liability insurance policy coverage notwithstanding an applicable exclusion when there is multiple independent causation, as explained in State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Partridge (1973) 10 Cal.3d 94 (Partridge). Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale