P. v. Washington
Appeal from a judgment of conviction of two counts of battery on a peace officer by gassing. Appellant contends that (1) the court violated his constitutional rights by requiring him to wear a stun belt during trial; (2) the prosecutor's evidence submitted at the bifurcated trial on the prior conviction enhancements was incompetent under Evidence Code section 1280, subdivision (c); and (3) the abstract of judgment must be amended to reflect the actual custody credits ordered by the trial court at the sentencing hearing. court find appellant's first two arguments unavailing, although as conceded by the Attorney General, his third contention is well taken. Accordingly, court reverse the judgment insofar as it sets forth appellant's custody credits and remand the matter for correction of the abstract of judgment, but otherwise affirm.
Comments on P. v. Washington