In re Iesha S.
Mother and father appeal from orders terminating their parental rights as to their daughters Iesha, Kaley, Breana, and T. Mother contends (1) the trial court erred when it denied her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 to modify the pending order, and (2) the court erred when it declined to find applicable the exception to termination that is set forth in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(A). Father contends the trial court erred because it continued to conduct hearings in his case even after it had concluded he needed a guardian ad litem. Court conclude the trial court did not commit any prejudicial errors and affirm the orders terminating mother's and father's parental rights.
Comments on In re Iesha S.