legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Robert O. v. Sup. Ct.
Father is the father of Eva O., a dependent child of the juvenile court. Pursuant to California Rules of Court 8.452, (former rule 38.1), father filed a petition for extraordinary relief seeking review of the trial court's order terminating reunification services and setting a permanency planning hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Father contends the trial court erred in finding he had been provided or offered reasonable reunification services. Court conclude that the order setting the section 366.26 hearing is supported by substantial evidence, and therefore deny the petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale