Conservatorship of Thomas F.
Thomas F. appeals from a judgment entered October 25, 2005, which reestablished his conservatorship under the Lanterman Petris Short Act (LPS). He contends that his LPS conservatorship must be reversed because it was based on the stipulation of counsel authorized by San Diego Superior Court Local Rule (Local Rule) 8.2.33 which he asserts is contrary to state law governing stipulated judgments as it did not require counsel to obtain his authorization or consent.
Court therefore dismiss the appeal as moot.
Comments on Conservatorship of Thomas F.