legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Belton
Defendant appeals from the reinstatement of the judgment following remand by this court (People v. Belton (Jan. 30, 2006, B182313) [nonpub. opn.]), after his conviction by jury of possession of cocaine (Health and Saf. Code, S 11350, subd. (a)) and the finding that he had sustained a prior felony conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, SS 1170.12, subds. (a) (d), 667, subds. (b) (i)).Our review of the sealed transcript establishes that the trial court made an adequate record of the documents it considered, describing the nature of each complaint and other documents, and that it properly exercised its discretion in determining that none of the complaints or documents were relevant to the officer's veracity.
The judgment as reinstated by the trial court is affirmed.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale