legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P.v . Coulson
The man who lived in an apartment returned home to find appellant burglarizing it. After a scuffle, appellant ran off with some of the man's property. Appellant was convicted of first degree burglary (count 1) and first degree robbery (count 2), with two prior strike convictions. He was sentenced to 35 years to life in prison, under the "Three Strikes" law. On appeal, he contends: (1) There was insufficient evidence of robbery. (2) The trial court should have instructed on grand theft person as a lesser included offense of robbery. (3) The trial court abused its discretion when it refused to strike one of the prior convictions, under People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero). (4) Imposition of concurrent sentences on counts 1 and 2 violated Penal Code section 654. (5) A $20 court security fee was improperly imposed, as the crime occurred prior to enactment of the statute authorizing the fee.
Respondent agrees that count 1 must be stayed pursuant to section 654. Court stay that count, strike the security fee, and otherwise affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale