Conservatorship of Fisher
Claris Fisher, the wife of conservatee, Meyer Fisher, appeals from a probate order settling the second account current filed by the Riverside County Public Guardian, acting as the successor permanent conservator for Meyer. (SS 1300, subds. (b) and (f), and 1301, subds. (c) and (e).) Claris is being represented by her son, a lawyer, Eric Neshanian. Riverside County Counsel represents the public guardian. The main point of contention on appeal is whether the public guardian failed to list two notes for the sale of a business called Color Lab as the major asset of Meyer's estate.
Court deny Claris's request for judicial notice of items four through 14, composed of various newspaper and magazine articles. (Evid. Code, SS 452, subd. (h), and 459; Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc. (1996) 14 Cal.4th 434, 444, fn. 3.)
Court hold the trial court did not err in denying Claris's motion for a directed verdict or in approving the second account current.
Comments on Conservatorship of Fisher