legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Martinez
Defendant was convicted by jury of unlawfully taking or driving a vehicle (count 1) and receiving stolen property (count 2) based on evidence that on November 17, 2005, he drove a car that had been stolen the day before. The car had a punched-out ignition and the stereo system was missing. Defendant was sentenced to the middle term of two years on count 1, with sentence on count 2 stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654. Restitution to the victim under Penal Code section 1202.4, subdivision (f), was ordered in the amount of $1,300.
Defendant contends that the restitution should have been limited to $1,200. The basis of the contention is that, although the victim testified he had spent "[a]bout $1,200, more or less" to fix the car and the probation officer's report indicated that the victim had reported a loss of "approximately $1,200," at the sentencing hearing the prosecutor stated that the loss was $1,300 and the court ordered restitution in that amount. The Attorney General aptly concedes that defendant's contention is meritorious and that the judgment should be modified to reflect the $1,200 amount. Court modify the judgment accordingly.



Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale