P. v. Smith
Defendant appeals from a judgment sentencing him to four years in state prison, after his probation was revoked. He claims that the trial court improperly relied upon hearsay evidence, including a statement he also contends was taken in violation of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436, to establish his probation revocation. Court find no reversible error and affirm.
Comments on P. v. Smith