legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dillard
On December 22, 2005, the district attorney filed a complaint charging Dillard with one count each of possession for sale of cocaine base (count 1/Health and Saf. Code, S 11351.5), resisting an executive officer (count 2/Pen. Code, S 69), and misdemeanor destroying evidence (count 3/Pen. Code, S 135). Counts 1 and 2 contained a serious felony enhancement (Pen. Code, S 667, subd. (a)), two prior prison term enhancements (Pen. Code, S 667.5, subd. (b)), a gang enhancement (Pen. Code, S 186.22, subd. (b)(1)), and allegations that Dillard had a prior conviction within the meaning of the three strikes law (Pen. Code, S 667, subds. (b) (i)). Count 1 also alleged a prior conviction enhancement (Health and Saf. Code S 11370.2).
Following independent review of the record court find that no reasonably arguable factual or legal issues exist.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale