In re Katherine M.
Marco M. and Josefina M. appeal judgments terminating their parental rights to their children Katherine M. and R.M. Josefina also appeals an order denying her petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388. Josefina asserts the court abused its discretion by denying her section 388 petition because the evidence showed she had completed reunification services in Tijuana, Mexico, and was able to care for the children. Marco contends the court erred in terminating parental rights because the evidence showed he and the children had beneficial parent child relationships and the court should have ordered a permanent plan of legal guardianship or long term foster care. Josefina joins Marco's argument. Marco joins Josefina's argument the court erred in terminating her parental rights. Court affirm the judgments and order.
Comments on In re Katherine M.