legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Maldonado
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after a jury trial. The jury found defendant guilty on two counts of attempted murder (Pen. Code, SS 187, 664). It found true the allegations that the attempted murders were committed willfully, deliberately and with premeditation (id., S 664, subd. (a)), that a principal personally and intentionally used and discharged a firearm, a rifle, in the commission of the crimes (id., S 12022.53, subds. (b) and (e)(1), (c) and (e)(1)), and that the crimes were committed for the benefit of a criminal street gang (id., S 186.22, subd. (b)(1)(C)). The jury found untrue the allegations that a principal caused great bodily injury to one of the victims (id., S 12022.53, subds. (d) and (e)(1)), and that defendant personally used and discharged a firearm, a handgun, causing great bodily injury to one of the victims (id., S 12022.53, subds. (b), (c), and (d)).
On appeal, defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence as to count 3, he challenges certain evidentiary rulings, he claims ineffective assistance of counsel and he claims sentencing error. Court agree as to the insufficiency of the evidence to support defendant's conviction on count 3, and that there was sentencing error. Court disagree with the remainder of defendant's contentions. Court remand for resentencing.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale