legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Gonzales
As ringleader, defendant committed a string of burglaries and auto thefts, as well as various other crimes, within a three-month period in Moreno Valley. Defendant appeals from judgment entered following jury convictions for 13 counts of first degree burglary (Pen. Code, S 459), eight counts of which someone was home when the burglaries occurred (S 667.5, subd. (c)(21)); two counts of second degree burglary (S 459); eight counts of receiving stolen property (§ 496, subd. (a)); five counts of grand auto theft with a prior auto theft conviction (Veh. Code, S 10851, subd. (a), S 666.5, subd. (a)); being a felon in possession of a firearm (§ 12021, subd. (a)(1)); possessing methamphetamine for sale (Health and Saf. Code, S 11378); possessing paraphernalia for ingesting narcotics (Health and Saf. Code, S 11364); and being under the influence of narcotics (Health and Saf. Code, S 11550, subd. (a)).
Defendant contends there was insufficient evidence to support 11 of the 15 burglary convictions since there was no evidence he entered the houses; there was insufficient evidence to support three of the five grand theft auto convictions and one of the convictions for receiving stolen property; and the court should have granted a mistrial based on jury deliberations misconduct. Court reject defendant's contentions and affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale