P. v. Arrington
Appellant was found guilty of displaying a falsified registration tag on his vehicle with intent to defraud in violation of Vehicle Code section 4463, subdivision (a). Although the tag was admittedly a fake, the date depicted on the tag was not current. Thus, appellant contends he could not have fooled or defrauded anyone. He appeals on the grounds that (1) there was no substantial evidence that he displayed the registration tag with intent to defraud, (2) the trial court prejudicially admitted hearsay evidence regarding the date of the vehicle's last registration, and (3) the trial court should have granted his Wheeler Batson motion. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Arrington