legal news


Register | Forgot Password

SMALL v. SUPERIORCOURTOFORANGECOUNTY
Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order No. 16 2001, which sets forth wages, hours and working conditions for employees in the on site construction industry and other occupations consistent with the terms of the Eight Hour Day Restoration and Workplace Flexibility Act of 1999, including regulations regarding elections to adopt and repeal alternative workweek schedules, is a valid exercise of the authority granted the commission under the act. Trial court's finding that wage order was "unreasonable, arbitrary, capricious and unfair" was an abuse of discretion where order was recommended by the statutorily required two-thirds majority of wage board made up of labor and management representatives and was not found by IWC to be unsupported by substantial evidence.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale