CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. ALNOR Part I
In opposing an anti SLAPP motion against its defamation claim, organization failed to demonstrate a probability of showing by clear and convincing evidence that challenged statement, while false, was made with "actual malice" with the knowledge that it was false or with serious subjective doubt as to its truthfulness where it did not show that the speaker's purported conversation with the alleged source of the published information was fabricated as opposed to simply misunderstood, that he doubted the reliability of his sources, or that there was a connection between speaker's ill will toward organization and his belief about the truth of his publication.
Comments on CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE v. ALNOR Part I