P. v. Diaz
A jury convicted defendant and appellant of one count of resisting an executive officer (Pen. Code, 69). Court hold that (1) the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to grant a continuance to permit defendant to conduct Pitchess[2]discovery, and (2) the trial court did not err in admitting evidence relating to a set of car keys found in defendants possession. Court therefore affirm defendants conviction.
Comments on P. v. Diaz