legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chapman
Defendant appeals from denial of his request for leave to file a motion to withdraw a no contest plea. Appellant contends he was not mentally competent at the time he entered his plea of no contest to one count of lewd conduct with a child (Pen. Code, 288, subd. (a)). He was sentenced to three years in state prison consistent with his plea bargain. In the absence of substantial evidence of incompetence at the time appellant entered his plea, the trial judge did not abuse his discretion by denying appellant's motion to withdraw the plea pursuant to section 1018, nor was the trial judge required by section 1368 to conduct a retroactive competency determination. In any event, appellant waived his constitutional claim by failing to object on constitutional grounds in the trial court.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale