In re Daniel G.
This is the second appeal by S.T. (Mother) that challenges the termination of her parental rights as to her son, Daniel G. (Daniel). In an unpublished opinion, we reversed a prior judgment terminating Mothers parental rights. (In re Daniel G. (Sept. 20, 2005, A107951).) Court remanded the case to the juvenile court for a new Welfare and Institutions Code[3]section 366.26 hearing. On remand, the juvenile court terminated Mothers parental rights and ordered a permanent plan of adoption for Daniel. Mother contends that the juvenile court erred in failing to apply the beneficial relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(A)) and sibling relationship ( 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(E)) exceptions. She also contends that the juvenile court erred in denying her request for a continuance. Finally, Mother urges that the juvenile courts order should be reversed because the proceedings were fundamentally unfair. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Daniel G.