P. v. Wilson
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of one count of second degree burglary. (Pen. Code, 459.) The jury also found that he had suffered five prior strikes. ( 667, subds. (d) & (e), & 1170.12, subds. (b) & (e).) On appeal, appellant claims: (1) he was prejudiced by ineffective assistance of counsel in connection with plea negotiations with the District Attorneys office, (2) the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to admit, under Evidence Code section 1101, subdivision (b)), evidence of two prior bad acts by appellant, and (3) he was entitled to a jury trial on the issue of his identity regarding his prior convictions. Court disagree with all of these contentions and hence affirm.
Comments on P. v. Wilson