In re David E.
Defendant and Appellant Joe M. (Joe) claims he is the biological and presumed father of one year old David E. Joe appeals from the orders and findings of the juvenile court denying him reunification services or visitation with David. Joe claims the court erred in finding that he was not a presumed father and failing to offer him reunification services or visitation with David. As explained below, court reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re David E.