legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Brown v. Northridge Emer. Med. Group
Plaintiffs and appellants Peter and Paula Brown filed a complaint for medical malpractice and loss of consortium in April 2003. Over a year later, in October 2004, they substituted defendants and respondents Dr. Ann McKittrick and Northridge Emergency Medical Group (NEMG) in as previously named Doe defendants. Dr. McKittrick and NEMG moved for summary judgment on the ground, among others, that the one year statute of limitations in Code of Civil Procedure section 340.5 barred the action against them. The trial court, holding that the October 2004 amendment naming Dr. McKittrick and NEMG as defendants did not relate back to the April 2003 original complaint, granted summary judgment in defendants favor. The Browns appealed. Court affirm the judgment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale