legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Pirante
Mark Angelo Pirante appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury on count 1 first degree murder (Pen. Code, 187, 189) with special circumstance findings that he committed the offense by lying in wait (Pen. Code, 190.2, subd. (a)(15)) and while kidnapping (Pen. Code, 190.2, subd. (a)(17)). The court sentenced appellant to prison for life without the possibility of parole.
In this case, court reject appellants argument that his Miranda advisement was deficient because a detective told appellant that anything he said may be used against him, instead of advising him that anything he said can and used against him. Either formulation is constitutionally sufficient.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale