In re Daniel P.
Cheryl P. and Daniel P., Sr. (Daniel, Sr.), (together, the parents) appeal the judgment terminating their parental rights to their son, Daniel, Jr. Cheryl contends the juvenile court abused its discretion by denying her Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 modification petition and by allowing the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the Agency) to examine her counsel's consultant psychologist at trial. Court affirm.
Comments on In re Daniel P.