legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Victor D.
Appellant appeals from the orders continuing him as a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602) after finding that he unlawfully possessed a firearm (Pen. Code, 12101, subd. (a)(1)) and placing him in a six month camp-community program. Before the adjudication, the juvenile court denied appellants motion to suppress evidence. (Welf. & Inst. Code, 700.1.)
Appellant contends that the juvenile court should have granted his motion to suppress evidence as his home was searched in the absence of a search warrant or exigent circumstances. He also claims that the search cannot be justified as a probation search. At the time of the search, the officers were aware that appellant was on probation for grand theft of an automobile, but did not know specific terms of his probation or whether he had a search condition of probation.
Court find exigency justifies the officers intrusion into appellants residence and that there was consent to the search. Consequently, court affirm the orders under review.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale