legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Marriage of Galvan
Henry Galvan (Henry) and Rosa Galvan (Rosa) were married in 1996. In 2001, the parties entered into a marital settlement agreement that was incorporated into a final judgment of marital dissolution on August 10 of that year. In December 2004, Henry filed a postjudgment motion (Fam. Code, 2556) requesting division of the "family residence" as an omitted asset that was not adjudicated in the judgment of dissolution. On November 7, 2005, the trial court issued an order finding the residence to be an omitted asset and setting a valuation date of August 10, 2001, the date of the dissolution judgment. On February 24, 2006, the court entered a final postjudgment order[2]determining that as of August 10, 2001, the value of the residence was $110,000 and that the equity in the residence was $26,391. The court ordered Rosa to pay Henry $13,140.50 to equalize division of the property.
Henry appeals from the postjudgment order granting his motion. He claims that the trial court erred in issuing its November 7, 2005 order adopting August 10, 2001 as the valuation date. Court affirm the November 7, 2005 order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale