Castillo v. City of Los Angeles
The demurrer of the City of Los Angeles (City) to Liliana Castillos operative second amended complaint (SAC) was sustained without leave to amend. Court treat this appeal as from the order of dismissal. Castillo contends her employer retaliated against her because she filed complaints of sex discrimination with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH). The City relies on judicial admissions in her initial and first amended complaints, which stated in part that the conduct of her supervisor was for personal, non work related reasons. Concluding that in the context of these pleadings there was no judicial admission and that appellant should be given leave to amend to plead with specificity, Court reverse the judgment of dismissal and remand for that purpose.
Comments on Castillo v. City of Los Angeles