P. v. Taylor
A jury convicted defendant James Taylor of (1) vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence, and (2) child endangerment. On appeal, defendant contends that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury sua sponte in the language of CALCRIM No. 3404 (defense of accident or misfortune). He alternatively claims that his trial attorney was constitutionally ineffective for not requesting CALCRIM No. 3404. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Taylor