Southern Counties Construction v. Garden Grove
Defendant seeks relief from a default judgment totaling $34,507.86. Defendant argues the judgment was improper because its answer to a superseded complaint was sufficient, the plaintiff could not maintain the action and the trial court lacked jurisdiction because plaintiff was an unlicensed contractor, the judgment violates the one final judgment rule and was in excess of the amount sought in the complaint, and the judgment was supported by insufficient evidence. Because none of these arguments have merit, court affirm.
Comments on Southern Counties Construction v. Garden Grove