legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Alejandro V.
In a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, 602), it was alleged that appellant Alejandro V., a minor, committed a lewd and lascivious act with a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code, 488, subd. (a)). Appellant admitted the allegation, and following the subsequent disposition hearing, the court denied appellants request for deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) under section 790, et seq.; adjudged appellant a ward of the court; and placed him on probation in the custody of his parents.
On appeal, appellant contends the court abused its discretion in denying appellants request for DEJ. Alternatively, he argues, if this argument is deemed waived by counsels failure to object to the courts denial he was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale