legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Charly G.
Florentina G. and Carlos G. appeal a judgment of the juvenile court terminating their parental rights to their minor son Charly G. under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26. Carlos challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the court's finding that Charly was likely to be adopted within a reasonable time. Florentina joins in Carlos's contention.
The San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (Agency) filed a motion to augment the record along with its Respondent's brief. The Agency seeks to introduce an interim review report it alleges contains new evidence showing the parents' challenge to adoptability is moot. Carlos filed an opposition to the motion. Court affirm the judgment and deny the motion to augment.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale