Ulloa v. McMillan Real Estate
Cross complainants Raul and Maria Ulloa appeal a judgment entered against them on their cross-complaint in an action against them for specific performance of a real estate sales contract. The Ulloas contend the trial court abused its discretion by granting the motions in limine of cross defendants McMillin Real Estate and Mortgage, Inc. (McMillin), dba Hanson Realty, a Corky McMillin Company (Hanson Realty), Paul Van Elderen, Dallas Woodring and Stanley Kellerup, to exclude evidence pertaining to Kellerup's signing of the sales agreement on behalf of his client, the buyer. Court find no abuse of discretion as there is no causal relationship between Kellerup's conduct and any damages of the Ulloas. Court affirm the judgment.
Comments on Ulloa v. McMillan Real Estate